Announcement

Collapse

Welcome to the JLC Forums – Read-Only Edition

Please note that the JLC forums are now displayed read-only. New posts are no longer possible, but the collected work of building professionals sharing information remains available here as a resource to the JLC community.
See more
See less

Aluminum siding and RRP

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Aluminum siding and RRP

    Yes they are. All of them. Once you test positive, the owner is required to disclose that in the future, which reduces the value of the house. I have never met a HO willing to take the testing risk, and I don't blame them.

    I'd say that for a 1960 house, there is a good chance that any paint has lead. Randy, can you share why you think factory paint in 1960 did not contain lead?

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Aluminum siding and RRP

      Originally posted by dgbldr View Post
      I'd say that for a 1960 house, there is a good chance that any paint has lead.
      Right. So then, what's the big concern about testing? The house is now less valuable because you know the paint has lead, vs being relatively certain it has lead?

      If I was in the market for a house, and a realtor showed me 2 houses, both built in 1960, and one of them had a disclosure stating lead paint in the siding, it would not mean that that house is now less valuable to me than the other house, because I have to operate under the assumption that the other house has lead paint also. You would never value a house built in that era at a certain price based on an assumption that the house didn't have lead paint. The only thing that would affect the house's price in terms of lead paint or not, is if the siding were tested, and it came back negative.

      How about this... Give them 2 prices, with the difference being RRP compliance. Then ask the customer if they will proceed with the job if either condition exists (lead or no lead). If they agree, then do the test, then do the job with or without compliance, depending on the outcome of the test. Then the siding is gone, and no issues with needing to disclose the presence of lead paint.

      The only reason I can think of not to do the test, is if they will opt to not remove the siding (because of the extra costs) if the test comes back (or would have come back) positive. Does that make sense?

      It's kinda like playing spades when the other team only needs 4 "books" to win. So they bid "board". And you bid 10. I've had this discussion many times. My brother gets it; My mother doesn't. She always says, "We can't possibly get 10!" I try to tell her that by bidding 10 it can't hurt us, only help.

      And I'm saying it's the same thing for that test. You find out there is no lead, then you're ahead of the game (no extra costs due to RRP compliance). You find out there is lead, nothing lost.

      Tom
      Last edited by TSJHD1; 06-08-2010, 08:35 AM.
      1) Unconsciously Incompetent: He knows not, and knows not that he knows not. He is a fool. Shun him.
      2) Consciously Incompetent: He knows not, and knows that he knows not. He is simple. Teach him.
      3) Unconsciously Competent: He knows, and knows not that he knows. He is asleep. Wake him.
      4) Consciously Competent: He knows, and knows that he knows. He is wise. Follow him.

      May we all endeavor to progress from not knowing that we know not, to knowing that we know.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Aluminum siding and RRP

        I still contend that a factory applied finish on aluminum or steel siding was not a lead base paint. It was a automotive type paint and finish , I don't know of any automotive paint that was lead paint. I don't know how old the siding is , but I would think you could get a factory spec sheet on the siding finish.I have seen aluminum siding - years old that is only weather fade with no flaking or peeling of the paint just like painted bad then .

        Randy
        Randy
        ________________________________________________

        The bitterness of poor quality lingers long after the sweetness of a cheap price is forgotten

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Aluminum siding and RRP

          Originally posted by TSJHD1 View Post
          Right. So then, what's the big concern about testing? The house is now less valuable because you know the paint has lead, vs being relatively certain it has lead?

          Tom
          Yes, that's exactly it. it may not be rational, but humans are not entirely rational beings. Most homebuyers aren't looking at things the way an experienced builder would.

          When the inspections and disclosures are set out at an open house, people at best kind of skim over the general ones. There is always some general statement about the possibility of lead paint in older homes, but it doesn't register with most folks the way a specific positive test does. Since every older home has the same boilerplate about the possibility, people eventually tune it out. A positive test tunes it right back in.

          k
          “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” - Upton Sinclair

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Aluminum siding and RRP

            Personally I think that very soon all pre- 78 houses will have to be tested for lead and disclosed when sold. I see that happenig once they no longer allow the test swabs. and require 3rd party testing on all work done on a home.


            Randy
            __________________________________________________ ________________________
            The bitterness of poor quality lingers long after the sweetness of a cheap price is forgotten.
            Randy
            ________________________________________________

            The bitterness of poor quality lingers long after the sweetness of a cheap price is forgotten

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Aluminum siding and RRP

              Originally posted by Randy Bush View Post
              Personally I think that very soon all pre- 78 houses will have to be tested for lead and disclosed when sold. I see that happenig once they no longer allow the test swabs. and require 3rd party testing on all work done on a home.


              Randy
              __________________________________________________ ________________________
              The bitterness of poor quality lingers long after the sweetness of a cheap price is forgotten.
              California already doesn't allow us to use the swabs for any kind of official result.
              k
              “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” - Upton Sinclair

              Comment

              Working...
              X