Re: Circular stairs: what is your favorite arrangement?
Re using 2x12 for risers:
Consider buying KD material if you use dimension lumber. It is apparent from the stair builders' comments that they are somewhat concerned about framing dimensions.
Lumber shrinks. If the design is such that each step is supported on its own posts-whether 2x4 or mfg stud material-then there will be no cumulative shrinking. The only shrinking that might have an effect would be from the top and bottom risers. Probably an eighth to 3/16ths of an inch. That would mean that the bottom tread would be that amount less above the finish floor. And that the top tread would be that amount lower than the second floor--unless the second floor framing also shrunk the same amount.
This is an amount "out" that finish stair builders should be able to handle. And is within code requirements.
Within the rest of the stair, if all the risers shrink equally, then there is no code concern about the relationship of each nose to the next because if they all shrink the same, then the relationship of nose to nose stays the same.
If the design were such that each step rested on the one below... Well the cumulative shrinking in such a setup is probably why you never see that.
Once when I was younger, a carpenter/contractor who I had worked for, and learned finish work from, took me on a tour of a home he was building. It was almost a year from when the stairs had been roughed in and he had his men getting ready to install the finish treads and risers. (This was just a regular straight flight stairs.)
He showed me with a level that all the points of the cut stair jacks had shrunk so that they were about a quarter inch out of level and out of plumb. That is-the nose side of the tread would be a quarter inch lower than the back end of the tread. And the top of each riser would be about a quarter inch "backwards" out of plumb.
This is the same sort of shrinkage that happens to picture frame casing around doors and windows when the casing material shrinks-it opens up on the inside of the joint.
He actually had his men using cedar door shims to shim every level cut on all 3 stair jacks so that the treads would sit level. It's been a number of years-I do not remember if they were shimming the risers too or not.
Bear in mind--this was an architect drawn custom home for wealthy people. This is not at all the sort of thing you would do on a tract home, a McMansion, or even on most upper end spec homes.
He was good enough that there is no question in my mind that when those stair jacks were cut they were cut right on. He would have explained/shown what he wanted to his crew --and if they couldn't do what he wanted they would have been let go. It was all shrinkage.
This shrinkage issue may be why one of the earlier comments suggested not using dimensional material?
Ward
Re using 2x12 for risers:
Consider buying KD material if you use dimension lumber. It is apparent from the stair builders' comments that they are somewhat concerned about framing dimensions.
Lumber shrinks. If the design is such that each step is supported on its own posts-whether 2x4 or mfg stud material-then there will be no cumulative shrinking. The only shrinking that might have an effect would be from the top and bottom risers. Probably an eighth to 3/16ths of an inch. That would mean that the bottom tread would be that amount less above the finish floor. And that the top tread would be that amount lower than the second floor--unless the second floor framing also shrunk the same amount.
This is an amount "out" that finish stair builders should be able to handle. And is within code requirements.
Within the rest of the stair, if all the risers shrink equally, then there is no code concern about the relationship of each nose to the next because if they all shrink the same, then the relationship of nose to nose stays the same.
If the design were such that each step rested on the one below... Well the cumulative shrinking in such a setup is probably why you never see that.
Once when I was younger, a carpenter/contractor who I had worked for, and learned finish work from, took me on a tour of a home he was building. It was almost a year from when the stairs had been roughed in and he had his men getting ready to install the finish treads and risers. (This was just a regular straight flight stairs.)
He showed me with a level that all the points of the cut stair jacks had shrunk so that they were about a quarter inch out of level and out of plumb. That is-the nose side of the tread would be a quarter inch lower than the back end of the tread. And the top of each riser would be about a quarter inch "backwards" out of plumb.
This is the same sort of shrinkage that happens to picture frame casing around doors and windows when the casing material shrinks-it opens up on the inside of the joint.
He actually had his men using cedar door shims to shim every level cut on all 3 stair jacks so that the treads would sit level. It's been a number of years-I do not remember if they were shimming the risers too or not.
Bear in mind--this was an architect drawn custom home for wealthy people. This is not at all the sort of thing you would do on a tract home, a McMansion, or even on most upper end spec homes.
He was good enough that there is no question in my mind that when those stair jacks were cut they were cut right on. He would have explained/shown what he wanted to his crew --and if they couldn't do what he wanted they would have been let go. It was all shrinkage.
This shrinkage issue may be why one of the earlier comments suggested not using dimensional material?
Ward
Comment