-
09-18-2012, 06:30 PM #16
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Suburbia (Washington, DC area)
- Posts
- 1,856
Re: Is Roofing Underlayment Unnecessary?
Not much to add except I recently got to see some 20-year-old-ish GAF stuff and it was in terrible shape. Brittle and cracked. I'd stick to regular felt if intending it to do anything.
I also agree with using ice guard under metal. Metal leaks.Doug
Favorite tool this week: Duo-Fast HT550 hammer tacker
Blog:
Three types of gas tank hot water heaters for your renovation
-
09-18-2012, 07:20 PM #17
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- cold, snowy, humid northeast
- Posts
- 257
Re: Is Roofing Underlayment Unnecessary?
Some of the synthetics claim that, if installed properly, they can be leak-free with no shingles above for up to 60 days.
Last edited by hank mavery; 09-18-2012 at 08:29 PM.
Ain't too Proud to Learn
-
09-23-2012, 05:41 PM #18
Regular Contributor
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 34
Re: Is Roofing Underlayment Unnecessary?
Felt will dry and crack over time under the shingles. It's only value was as short term protection and a vapor barrier. Remember moisture flows both ways.I am a big fan of the synthetics and can attest if properly installed they will stay leak free. You have to use caps to install them to prevent tear-off and seal around the nail/staple. They are only limited by their UV rating and some are up to a year now. Get the best quality and you'll pay about twice per square as 30# felt. We've all tacked our felt down only to come back the next day and see a bubbly mess. Not with the synthetics. Four feet wide and much lighter.
-
09-24-2012, 06:19 PM #19
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- cold, snowy, humid northeast
- Posts
- 257
Re: Is Roofing Underlayment Unnecessary?
If the caps prevent leaks, what prevents the leaks where the roofing nails penetrate? Is it the material of the asphalt shingle being compressed by the roofing nail?
Ain't too Proud to Learn


Reply With Quote