Thread: Future of non-IC lights
-
04-10-2012, 08:30 PM #16
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Northwest Indiana
- Posts
- 5,577
Re: Future of non-IC lights
I believe you miss heard, they most likely said HID.
Here are LED headlamp bulbs, no cooling fins;
http://www.dhgate.com/wholesale/led+headlight+bulb.html
You will find the same with the rest of the auto bulbs. No fins.
Look at all the LED's in automotive/truck tail/running/signaling lights in use today.
LED's are getting much better and do not contain mercury. I'll use an LED over a CFL, any day. There are many on the market now with higher foot candle to consumption than CFL'S.
Tom
-
04-10-2012, 08:58 PM #17
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Southern California
- Posts
- 2,184
Re: Future of non-IC lights
And Home Depot has some 40w Edison base LED bulbs for around $10.
HERS Rater • BPI Building Analyst • BPI Envelope Professional
Certified Green Building Professional • Certified Existing Home Advisor
General Building Contractor • Asbestos Certification • Hazardous Substance Removal Certification • EPA Approved Lead-Safe Contractor • Locksmith
PMP • ESEP • CISSP
-
04-11-2012, 05:58 PM #18
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Georgia
- Posts
- 1,725
-
04-11-2012, 06:07 PM #19
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- midwestish
- Posts
- 6,405
Re: Future of non-IC lights
Having cooling fins does not mean they are hotter/less efficient. LED's are, generally, more sensitive to heat so having a means to keep them burning cooler keeps their life, like any electronic device, maximized. The large cooling fins could well be put on to help dissipate proximate heat inputs from the engine/cooling system ...or frictional induction from insect collisions at high speed.
Food for thought: "Man is the only animal that can remain on friendly terms with the victims he intends to eat until he eats them."
~ Samuel Butler
-
04-11-2012, 06:24 PM #20
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Georgia
- Posts
- 1,725
Re: Future of non-IC lights
Good point, but I know I've seen LED bulbs at Wal Mart that are less efficient than fluorescent. Which is not to say that all LEDs are crap - at some point this decade I expect to be buying nothing but LEDs.
-
04-11-2012, 07:18 PM #21
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Northwest Indiana
- Posts
- 5,577
Re: Future of non-IC lights
Who ever said it needs to do some checking. You may be miss understanding their reference to heat and how it needs to be rear dissipated. They do not "project" much heat.
A 60 watt equivalent LED produces 3.4 BTU's per hour, a 60 watt incandescent is 85 BTU's per hour.
Grab hold of an on halogen 55 watt headlamp bulb, does not take it long to reach 325°, do the same with a 55 watt LED headlamp. After you're treated for the halogen burns, report back.
TomLast edited by tjbnwi; 04-11-2012 at 07:22 PM.
-
04-11-2012, 07:43 PM #22
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- midwestish
- Posts
- 6,405
Re: Future of non-IC lights
Food for thought: "Man is the only animal that can remain on friendly terms with the victims he intends to eat until he eats them."
~ Samuel Butler
-
04-12-2012, 06:24 PM #23
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Georgia
- Posts
- 1,725
Re: Future of non-IC lights
Fluorescent efficiency tops out at about 100 lumens per watt. This LED bulb is 33 l/w:
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Sunmia-1.5...-Bulb/14472543
BTW, I have also seen CFL's that trip the thermal limiter on 30 yo recessed cans.
-
04-12-2012, 06:46 PM #24
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Friday Harbor, San Juan Island, Washington
- Posts
- 13,029
Re: Future of non-IC lights
A lot of those installed by the electric co-op here are in the 50-60 lumens/watt range.
http://springlightcfl.com/FileUpload...ht_Catalog.pdf
-
04-12-2012, 07:45 PM #25
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Northwest Indiana
- Posts
- 5,577
Re: Future of non-IC lights
-
04-12-2012, 07:48 PM #26
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Friday Harbor, San Juan Island, Washington
- Posts
- 13,029
-
04-12-2012, 07:51 PM #27
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- midwestish
- Posts
- 6,405
Re: Future of non-IC lights
And does Wallyworld have a comparable size and shape CFL?
http://www.nlb.org/index.cfm?cdid=10747&pid=10213
It's still difficult to make the broad statement w/o taking in to consideration the other factors in a bulbs design as well as the fixture and application/use and serviceability. Of course we all know a car is faster than a horse, too. ;)Food for thought: "Man is the only animal that can remain on friendly terms with the victims he intends to eat until he eats them."
~ Samuel Butler
-
04-12-2012, 08:12 PM #28
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Georgia
- Posts
- 1,725
-
04-12-2012, 08:31 PM #29
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Northwest Indiana
- Posts
- 5,577
Re: Future of non-IC lights
David,
Here's the link;
http://store.earthled.com/products/e...led-light-bulb
Charles,
I agree, some LED bulbs are junk.
tom
-
04-12-2012, 08:53 PM #30
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- new jersey
- Posts
- 508
Re: Future of non-IC lights
The reason for the heat is not the bulbs but the step down transformer inside the bulb. Led's are all 2 or 3 v I believe ( if I remember correctly, from the explanation given to me by a electrical engineer yesterday ). If you notice how heavy the 120v led bulbs are compared to the low voltage bulbs, it's because of the weight of the transformer.
You can buy a low volt fixture with 10 led's for $18 but a 120 v with 1 to 3 bulbs are $30.



Reply With Quote