-
03-25-2012, 02:24 PM #1
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Boston
- Posts
- 492
R-22 Icynene vs. R-38 Cellulose retrofit
Am insulating the attic of an uninsulated 100 year old house.
The attic is finished nicely, but has no access above it's flat ceiling. There
is no venting at ridge or gables. Several of the eave storage areas are open,
and I will knock holes for insulation in those that aren't. No access panels
to attic crawl space exist, and I will knock holes there too.
Met with established insulation co. Recommended R-22 Icynene behind kneewalls
and R-38 cellulose on flat ceilings (R-30 cellulose in sloped cavities).
For $1000 more they offered R-22 on pitched roof decks. Not pulling a permit, so
don't need to meet code. They say R-22 is biggest bang for buck, plus we've
got 6 inch rafters.
Question: does extra air seal of R-22 on roof deck outweigh the higher R-value of
the flat ceiling insulation?
-
03-25-2012, 06:38 PM #2
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Dallas,PA
- Posts
- 907
Re: R-22 Icynene vs. R-38 Cellulose retrofit
CD, The fact that this is a hundred year old house leads me to want some additional information. Do you have any info. on the background humidity levels in the home? Is the basement wet, does it have a dirt floor,... basic dampness profile kind of information? Also what is the roof sheathing or sheathing types, visible from inside as well as to what may have been added to the top side?
Also a little confused regarding your statement that they would install R-30 in closed slope cavities but R-22 in 6" rafters. Are the rafters in the living space of the attic furred to get to a larger dimension to accomodate the R-30 cellulose?"ALS IK KAN" - Stickley
-
03-25-2012, 08:44 PM #3
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Portland Maine
- Posts
- 433
Re: R-22 Icynene vs. R-38 Cellulose retrofit
#1- The great state of MA requires permits for insulation these days. Not telling you what to do but I've had to pull permits for retro-fit insulation in MA a number of times.
#2- R value is R value, and any insulation that's done should have air sealing done in conjunction. I'd go for higher R value if possible.Mike
The Democrats are the party that says government will make you smarter, taller, richer, and remove the crabgrass on your lawn. Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work, and then they get elected and prove it. -P.J. O'Rourke
-
03-25-2012, 08:49 PM #4
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Boston
- Posts
- 492
Re: R-22 Icynene vs. R-38 Cellulose retrofit
Still stumped.
1. I was taught that air sealing was more important than R value once you got to a certain
level of R value. (R 22?)
2. Calvert. Some good questions. Not sure if the sloping roof is furred, was relying on sub's quote. Basement is dry and has concrete. Roof is sheathed with original boards and 10 year old tar paper with asphalt shingles over.
-
03-25-2012, 08:50 PM #5
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Posts
- 3,922
-
03-25-2012, 09:00 PM #6
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Boston
- Posts
- 492
Re: R-22 Icynene vs. R-38 Cellulose retrofit
Great state of MA makes sure that no good deed goes unpunished. HO wants to better their existing home, and have to pay the state for the privilege. Now, if the reasoning was that the town was scared the careless GC would forget the ignition barrier, I see a legitimate public safety concern. But we all know that's not the reason.
Getting back to the post, I read that R-12 stops 93% of all conductive heat loss. Hence, R-22 Icynene would do a bit better, PLUS stop the air loss that R-38 cellulose doesn't.
-
03-26-2012, 07:41 AM #7
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Northern Vermont
- Posts
- 1,381
Re: R-22 Icynene vs. R-38 Cellulose retrofit
CD Services,
This is an old debate. Spray foam contractors have been spreading falsehoods about R-values for many years, and have (unfortunately) urged people to install lower R-values than the minimum values required by code.
Here's an article on the topic:
http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/...n-icynene-says
-
03-26-2012, 08:01 AM #8
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Boston
- Posts
- 492
Re: R-22 Icynene vs. R-38 Cellulose retrofit
Thank you Martin.
From a building science perspective, how would R-22 Icynene for air sealing PLUS R-19 unfaced batts on ceiling perform?
-
03-26-2012, 08:50 AM #9
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Northern Vermont
- Posts
- 1,381
Re: R-22 Icynene vs. R-38 Cellulose retrofit
C.D.,
Where are you putting these products? On a sloped ceiling or a flat ceiling?
Are both products sharing the same rafter bays (or joist bays)? Or do you want to install half the insulation in the rafter bays, and half the insulation somewhere else?
-
04-08-2012, 09:19 PM #10
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Boston
- Posts
- 492
Re: R-22 Icynene vs. R-38 Cellulose retrofit
Martin,
R-22 Icynene on pitched roof and batts on rafter ties.
-
04-09-2012, 08:25 AM #11
Veteran Contributor
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Northern Vermont
- Posts
- 1,381
Re: R-22 Icynene vs. R-38 Cellulose retrofit
CDS,
You can't separate the two layers of insulation like that if you have a vented attic. Is this a sealed attic? If the attic is sealed, put all the insulation in your rafter bays.
More information here:
http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/...ditioned-attic


Reply With Quote
